CAREER OR MARRIAGE?

 

Today’s marriages are not the same as marriages 50 years ago. In some ways they are, of course, but what has changed is many of the dynamics between spouses: dynamics around money, power, sex, and raising a family. I notice more equanimity in marriages today, which is good news, but I also see the conflict that comes sometimes from sharing power. New opportunities create new challenges. It can often feel like a competition.

In couples therapy, this competition can reveal or trigger deep hurts and create resentments over time. Whose career gets priority? Do you have to choose between your marriage or your career? What if both are screaming for your attention?

This is why it is more important than ever to see you and your spouse as being on the same team–a team that you both want to win the game. There is a big difference between approaching a competition as a team vs. as rivals!

What I suggest is that it does not have to be a competition at all–your individual pursuits and goals can also serve the marriage as a whole, not just each of you individually. But to get to this place requires the skills of talking and listening, curiosity, compassion, and commitment to the wellbeing of your relationship. As they say, if your relationship is not thriving, neither are you. So let’s take a look at how to navigate these seemingly opposing needs.

WHY DO WE FEEL WE HAVE TO CHOOSE?: In the “olden days”, marriage was something that provided security and status to women (or a prison, depending on how you look at it), and penetrative sex to men (at least until children were born). Many marriages were part of the plan for running a farm or household, and the gender roles were clear. Men worked outside the home, women worked inside the home. Men made the money, women raised the children.

It sometimes worked, but many times it did not, primarily for women, who had little to no choice or options either in or out of a marriage. Fortunately, today’s relationships and marriages are not as restricting for the individuals in them. But you know what they say: when old problems go away, new problems appear.

Whereas in the past a major difficulty was sexual affairs outside of the marriage, today’s bigger betrayal is the threat of spouses spending too much time at work, or dealing with work at home. One’s career is the new “third person” so to speak. And the neglected spouses aren’t sure how to speak up about this since technically the other is not doing anything “wrong” by being committed to their career!

Any lack of boundaries protecting a marriage from intrusions will become a problem no matter what the intrusion is–even when it comes from within (kids and pets!). Unwanted intrusions can cause resentment, disconnection, hurt, and can also interfere with self-care, which can affect how someone feels about initiating or receiving sex.

So what gives? Why is work taking up so much more of our time than in the past? Well, some of the reasons I have noticed include:

  • Greater competition to succeed
  • Lack of respect from work an individual’s boundaries around personal time
  • Higher financial obligations and responsibilities at home
  • The ability to do work from home increases access and shortens deadlines

Beyond this, I also hear in sessions that there is some shame attached to “choosing the relationship”, and this applies to both men and women. Those who choose to prioritize their family or personal life are often seen as not being ambitious or motivated, or making a “soft” choice. This can put a lot of pressure on individuals who will report feeling pulled from both ends. This tug-of-war can turn a loving relationship into just another set of obligations that need to be met.  Not good!

WHAT WORKS BETTER: The solution to modern problems is rarely to go back to the way things were, rather, in looking forward couples can use new information and their own creativity to experiment with what works for them. We have never been in the relationship dilemma that we now face, so new ideas are required!

Let’s start first with identifying the options:

  • choose career
  • choose relationship/family
  • choose some version of both

What would you choose? There is no “right” answer, because what works for one couple might not work for another. Within one relationship, there will be times when choosing a career is necessary, while at other times choosing the relationship/family is called for. Most couples today choose a version of both, but this is often by default rather being planned out, leaving the individuals involved feeling trapped.

What I recommend is a choice that works across the board. In my work, I strive to offer couples simple approaches to complex issues, and fortunately there are a number of these that have proven track records. What I suggest for the career or relationship tug-of-war is from Stan Tatkin, who in his book In Each Other’s Care writes about the need to “put the needs of the relationship first at all times”. How is this to be applied?

When couples choose the needs of the relationship, they have the highest chance of making choices that ensures they also thrive as individuals. But the caveat is that for this to work well, it is essential that a couple have a shared vision for their relationship or marriage. Otherwise, in choosing the needs of the relationship, they may find themselves favoring different priorities.

So the first step when a couple finds themselves struggling is to create their shared vision–the direction they want to move toward together. For  example, if their shared vision is to raise a family, then their priorities should move them in that direction, whereas if their shared vision is to run a successful business together, they are likely to have different priorities.

However, a couples’ priorities are usually not so well-aligned. This is where Stan Tatkin’s approach becomes essential. Let’s say there is a couple where one individual values having a thriving career, while the other values managing a home and raising a family. In order for this couple to thrive together, they have to ask themselves, “What does the relationship need?” In other words, how can they both thrive? It is not a question of one winning and the other losing!

In this example, one approach could be that the career-minded partner choose a career that allows them to be home in the evenings and weekends. For the partner who may not be working, they might want to talk about how finances will be managed so that both partners have some spending autonomy and independence. Whatever approach they take, the guiding principle is what do we need to thrive both as a couple and as individuals? Choosing the needs of the relationship (which is made up of the individuals) ensures that this principle will take precedence.

So when faced with the choice of career or relationship, my suggestion (and Stan Tatkin’s!) is to choose the relationship, specifically, what the relationship needs.

HOW TO USE THIS FOR ANY CONFLICT: What I love about “across the board” approaches is that they can be used across the board! If you find yourself having a conflict of interests with anyone in your life, you can ask yourself, “What does this relationship need to thrive?” to identify options where you both win. Prioritizing what the relationship needs avoids elevating one’s individual needs over another’s. The relationship becomes primary.

I have written about other “across the board” approaches, such as my favorite: “What would Love do?”, and the beauty of these questions is that they lead one to actions and choices based in compassion, humility, kindness, and wisdom.

Modern life offers us the option of choosing our own priorities rather than having them imposed upon us by society, culture, and family. We shouldn’t  have to suffer because we choose one priority over another. You can have both career and relationship satisfaction as long as you find a balance that allows you, your partner, and your relationship to thrive.

WHAT THE ARTICLES DON’T TALK ABOUT

As you might imagine, I read a lot of articles about psychology and relationships. A lot! I learn new things all the time, and I find that suggestions offered for how to improve one’s relationship to be generally spot on–on paper at least, and that is where the problem is. I often think to myself, why, with all the good advice and suggestions available, why are so many still struggling to build and keep satisfying relationships? Why can’t we just take the skills we read about, apply them, and see things get better? 

Well, you can. You can take the skills and apply them and have things get better, but you can also try to apply them and have nothing change. And save for a few very honest couples therapists, not many writers will tell you this information in the selling points of their books. 

What I hope to explore in this article is not whether or not relationship books are helpful (they are), but instead what makes it difficult to implement what they suggest–obstacles that are not talked about that I see time and again in my therapy office.  For brevity, I have included just a few of these, but the list is by no means exhaustive.

MARIJUANA: I am no teetotaler! I think that there are many ways to get through a day, but of course some of these ways can hurt as much as they help, and this is why it is critical to make choices that work for our health and relationship as well as our mental well-being. Pot can be problematic because it affects each individual differently, but what I see consistently are two effects: it causes disconnection; and it narrows our window of tolerance over time. 

In layman’s terms, when one partner is on pot and the other is not, there can be a gap in communication and connection, but usually only the sober partner recognizes this, making it difficult to be heard or acknowledged. Additionally, the partner using pot is more easily triggered into feeling attacked, and may have less capacity to self-regulate or respond in a caring way. 

Working with couples like this is always a challenge because I want to be careful to not shame the partner who uses pot, but it is important to call out areas where it is not working vs. areas where it is. Unless a couple is willing to have this conversation, then they will resort to trying to change one another, to no avail. 

STEROIDS: I read  a number of articles about the effects of hard drugs, alcohol abuse, and prescription meds on relationships, but I have yet to find anything about the effects of steroid use on communication and conflict management. I suspect this is because steroid use is most common among gay men these days, meaning it is not considered a mainstream issue. But as someone who has gay male couples coming into my office, I know that I am not imagining the problem. 

Steroid use, like marijuana, affects everyone differently, and there are generalizations about their use that do not apply universally. One of these generalizations is the idea of “roid rage”, which suggests that steroids make the user angrier and more reactive. While this does not always show up, I can attest to struggling with clients’ reactivity where one or both are using steroids to increase muscle mass. 

Usually the work reaches a speedbump that is difficult to get over, and they will stop coming. As a therapist, I cannot make anyone, or even tell them, to stop using steroids, or any other substance, but I will comment on what is happening in the room and ask if this reactivity increases when they are on a cycle of the drugs. I feel this is the best I can do, and it is up to the clients to decide what is more important to them. I assure them that it is normal to have competing values, and while it is not always easy to choose between one or another, it is even more difficult to successfully reach opposing goals. 

DIFFERENCES IN HOW CONSENT IS EXPERIENCED: (I intend to write a longer article about this in the future, but it warrants inclusion in this newsletter due to my recent realization of its importance.) When it comes to socks, it may be “one size fits all”, but that is not the case with subjective experiences of consent. Men and women are told different stories of what consent is, with men often hearing that “as long as they don’t say no, it is a yes!”, and women hearing  a version of “you have an obligation to keep your partner happy”. True consent is rarely present in either story, and therein lies the problem with “one size fits all” approaches to it that are often suggested in print. 

I have found in my work with couples that agreements around consent are different in every relationship, and therefore it must be discussed. For many reasons, they usually are not discussed, causing issues with sexual satisfaction and frequency, silent resentments, trust, safety, and more. A couples’ failure to talk about consent stems from either cultural assumptions or ignorance, both of which can be remedied for the benefit of their sex life. 

Reading about consent is good, but often not good enough. A book cannot tell you about any negative conditioning you or your partner may have personally been exposed to in the past that interferes with true consent. Books that I have read suggest that willingness be present in any sexual situation, but what if you have never felt truly willing in a sexual situation? Willingness is easier if you feel you have the power to say no, but if not, can one truly give consent?

If you are having trouble with consent in your relationship, or any of the other issues I wrote about, I strongly suggest seeking out the help of a qualified couples and sex therapist–your relationship, satisfaction, and safety may depend on it!

SHOULD YOU GET MARRIED?

Love can influence us to do all kinds of crazy things, can’t it? In the best case scenario, love motivates us to move outside our comfort zones into areas that feed emotional, spiritual, mental, and physical development. And in the worst case it can fuel our desire to hurt, injure, or destroy another, or even ourselves.

I am particularly interested in love when it causes couples to marry, because married couples, often those who are no longer “drunk” on love, are the majority of my therapy clients. They enter my office feeling betrayed by love and by each other, wondering if they can ever trust their feelings again.

How can love, such a welcoming and powerful host, “abandon” us once we accept its enticing invitation? How is it that love can, over time, peel back the illusion to reveal a partner who is not who we thought they were?

Well, it is my assertion that love does not do these things, rather, it is our conditioned way of thinking about love that creates these thoughts. Real love, when practiced regularly, does not sneakily reveal uncomfortable truths about our partner. It instead can show us layers we did not know were there–levels of history and experience that continue to be molded and reinterpreted. Real love reveals not lies or flaws, but vulnerability, which is essential to creating closeness, trust, and safety.

What does this have to do with whether or not a couple should marry? It has everything to do with it! Couples have the option of marrying for reasons that, over time, either work or don’t work, but I notice they often find themselves in the latter position, sadly. Fortunately this outcome is preventable. There are a lot of different reasons why a couple “should” get married, but I intend to highlight the one reason I have found that leads couples to real love over time.

***

Remember that “new love” feeling? The endless energy and interest, the aliveness, the skin that feels extra sensitive, the mouth that tastes more, the eyes that see brighter colors. That is a fantastic feeling, but the truth is that it ain’t love! It is real, just not real love. It is the powerful process of bonding, and all the feelings that go along with that, without which we might never find a mate.

Many successful marriages have used these feelings as reason enough to wed, and to be honest, they can result in a successful marriage over time. But it is not the feelings that created success; it was the couple’s willingness to move past them into differentiation, and eventually, genuine interest in, and respect for, each other’s differences.

What motivates that interest and respect? Well, if you think about your own life, what is it that makes you interested in someone? Usually, we are drawn to those whom we admire, find attractive, are curious about, who make us laugh or stimulate us intellectually. We are also drawn to people around whom we feel good about ourselves.

So if it ain’t love, then what might we call this feeling that bounces between individuals? I call it potential.

We feel the potential of what we can become, individually and together, how alive we can feel, and how much we want to be engaged with another and the world. Couples sometimes choose to marry because of this potential, only to see it wilt on the vine after a number of years. This does not always mean they should not have married. The feeling of potential is not an illusion, but it also not a guarantee of outcome. Potential leads to nothing unless action is regularly taken on it.

What I will assert is that feelings of new love invite us to experience the potential of a better self, but what ultimately determines if we should or shouldn’t marry is whether or not we accept, and then act on, that invitation.

***

You know how, if you were lucky, your parents used to make you feel like the most important person in the world? You weren’t that, of course, but it sure felt good to be treated this way. What your parents were inviting you to experience was your potential, believe it or not. You thought you were the most important person in the world, whereas they thought that you could be.

Regarding adult relationships, new love also makes us feel like the most important person in the world for a time, but in reality it is an invitation to become something more. More what? More loving, more patient, more fun, more spontaneous, more compassionate, more understanding. more passionate, more sexual, more curious, more humble.

The reason this invitation is so enticing is because when we succeed in becoming more of these things, we are living “the good life”. One definition of the good life I like is that it is “having better problems” (Thank you, Mark Manson). A more romantic definition of it is that in the good life we are better versions of ourselves.

If you are in a relationship where you hate how you are showing up, you have a choice: you can work on the relationship or you can get out of it. Working on the relationship, with the skilled guidance of a trained couples therapist, will reveal if the relationship is a good or bad fit. The good news is that most relationships are a good fit, the partners just don’t know where they fit together. It is in the coming together where our potential can be acted upon and realized.

And this brings us back to the most important reason, in my mind, why one should get married to their partner. Because being with them constantly inspires you to be better. This reason supersedes sexual attraction (which can fade) and compatibility (which is a myth). If you find a person whose very presence in your life challenges and motivates you to be better, every day, who inspires you to be the version of yourself your potential has always hinted at, then marry them. That is not just a commitment to another, it is also a commitment to living a good life.